Archive post: »Has Venstre been bribed? Daniel Staugaard (V) once again manages to g« · 2024-11-29

• Daniel Staugaard — Mentioned in the current archived text
• Ellen Trane Nørby — Mentioned in the current archived text
• Jørgen Mads Clausen — Mentioned in the current archived text
• Peter Hansen — Mentioned in the current archived text

Source title: Er Venstre blevet bestukket? Daniel Staugaard (V) formår endnu en gang at g

Text version dated 29 Nov 2024

Er Venstre blevet bestukket? Daniel Staugaard (V) formår endnu en gang at gøre sit parti til genstand for latterliggørelse. Er Venstre i Sønderborg på gale veje? https://youtu.be/ASwAnGLnsGo Venstres handlinger i Sønderborg Kommune giver anledning til alvorlige spørgsmål, som pressen ikke tør stille, og som andre politikere åbenlyst undgår.

Er det inkompetence, dobbeltmoral – eller er der en mere ubehagelig forklaring bag de ulogiske beslutninger? I denne uge har to sager i byrådet vist, hvor absurd og vilkårlig Venstres prioriteringer kan være. Lad os dykke ned i dem.

Sag 1: Når ekspropriation er "umuligt" Venstre afviste at støtte ekspropriation af jord til en offentlig sti. Argumentet? At det ikke var "samfundsvigtigt nok" – og at processen ikke var fulgt korrekt, selvom lignende procedurer er blevet anvendt utallige gange tidligere.

Daniel Staugaard (V) gjorde et stort nummer ud af at forsvare ejendomsretten som ukrænkelig – en holdning, der umiddelbart virker prisværdig. Men som næstformand for udvalget bærer han selv ansvaret for, at processen ikke er blevet fulgt korrekt. Det mest opsigtsvækkende er dog Venstres tidligere afgørelser.

For da det handlede om ølleverancer til Danfoss' spillested, var ekspropriation pludselig både muligt og nødvendigt. Øl til en privat virksomhed blev altså vurderet som "samfundsvigtigt", mens en offentlig sti, der kunne gavne mange borgere, ikke var det. Den groteske prioritering giver et skarpt indblik i, hvordan borgelige tilsyneladende vælger side ud fra, hvem der står til at drage fordel.

Sag 2: Når ekspropriation pludselig er "nødvendigt" I samme møde stemte Venstre for ekspropriation af jord til et trafikkryds ved et nyt resort – et projekt, der klart gavner lokale erhvervsinteresser. Her blev ejendomsretten pludselig ikke længere betragtet som ukrænkelig. Daniel Staugaard, der for få minutter siden havde stærke meninger om ejendomsretten i stisagen, blev nu helt tavs.

Ingen forklaringer, ingen forsvar – blot en pinlig stilhed. Venstre og vennerne Det er svært at overse mønstret: Når beslutninger skal træffes, afhænger Venstres holdning tilsyneladende af, hvem der står bag projektet. Danfoss-ejer Jørgen Mads Clausen og konkursrytteren Peter Hansen synes at have en betydelig indflydelse på partiets handlinger.

Ingen borgmesterkandidat til 2025 Er Ellen Trane Nørby stadig borgmesterkandidat for Venstre til valget i 2025, eller er hun blevet træt af at tabe? Hun har trods alt kun tabt én gang, mens hendes forgænger, Peter Hansen – kendt som en konkursrytter – måtte gennem flere nederlag, før han trak sig. Ellen Trane Nørby kunne jo passende pege på Danfoss-ejeren Jørgen Mads Clausen, da det ofte synes at være hans ord – og ikke dansk lovgivning – der bestemmer i Sønderborg.

En mail uden svar Vi har sendt Daniel Staugaard en mail med spørgsmål om de mange ulogiske beslutninger og særbehandlinger, der præger kommunen. Svaret? Det forbliver en gåde.

Hvis du, kære læser, undrer dig over, hvordan disse ting kan ske i et retssamfund som Danmark, så er du ikke alene. Vi opfordrer til at stille de spørgsmål, som ingen andre tør – for Sønderborg fortjener bedre. ---------- Forwarded message --------- Fra: ejeren Date: tirs. 22. nov. 2022 kl. 20.06 Subject: Der foregår uregelmæssigheder i den kommune du repræsenterer. Daniel Staugaard To: <das@sonderborg.dk> Kære byrådsmedlem Daniel Staugaard Der foregår uregelmæssigheder i den kommune du repræsenterer.

Lovgivning, der burde være ens for alle, bøjes i forvaltningen helt ud til kanten for at favorisere en udvalgt gruppe af borgere - og hæmme initiativ og udvikling hos andre. I mange tilfælde går man så langt, at landets love tilsyneladende ikke overholdes. Som folkevalgt formoder jeg, at du, over for dine vælgere, har en forpligtelse til at medvirke til, at alle borgere får samme fair behandling i Sønderborg Kommune.

Derfor føler jeg, at du skal være informeret om, at virkeligheden i øjeblikket er en helt anden. Mens forvaltningen lægger så mange forhindringer ud for nogle byggeprojekter, at de sikkert aldrig bliver mulige at gennemføre, kører andre, helt tilsvarende sager, igennem på rekordtid. I øvrigt med de samme sagsbehandlere.

Udefra ser det ud til at en gruppe af byens erhvervsfolk, stort set kan diktere forvaltningens afgørelser på forhånd. Eksempelvis vil en uvildig undersøgelse af 3 byggesager som: Sergenten, Møllestedgård og Skansegården kunne afsløre, at den samme sagsbehandler/bevaringsarkitekt har vurderet utroligt forskelligt i de enkelte sager. Jeg har præcis dokumentation, der viser, hvor forskelligt der vurderes.

I Sønderborg er alle ikke lige for loven, og det har, trods mange forsøg, vist sig helt umuligt at få sat fokus på problemerne internt i kommunen. Et tidligere forsøg på at påpege forskelsbehandlingen i en kommunal sagsbehandlers vurderinger gav en kraftig respons fra Sønderborg kommune ledelse - men desværre kun i form af en nægtelse af, at der overhovedet var et problem. Derfor forsøger jeg nu, med et team af specialister, at få instanser uden for Sønderborg til at vurdere nogle af de mest åbenlyst forskelsbehandlede sager.

Det involverer eksempelvis Vejdirektoratet, Planklagenævnet m.fl. Jeg er naturligvis klar over, at forvaltningen ikke kan agere helt ude af samklang med de politiske udvalg - hvorfor disse oplysninger sikkert ikke er ny viden for alle. Da jeg ikke ved, hvor mange politikere der er en del af dette spil - eller er vidende om, at det foregår - sender jeg denne tekst til dig og alle andre byrådsmedlemmer.

Jeg beder dig om at bruge nogle minutter på at se på den vedlagte dokumentation, der primært er bragt til veje gennem aktindsigt. Materialet sendes desuden til planklagenævnet. Planklagenævnet - Klage vedr.

Gerlachsgade 2 og 10, Sønderborg Overskridelse af byggefelter, mangelfuld miljøscreening/miljøvurdering, manglende hensyntagen til oprindelig arkitektur og bevaringsværdig brostensbelægning m.m. Hvordan får man lov til at etablere et koncertsted med blandt andet et sygehus som nabo? Diverse spørgsmål og aktindsigtsanmodninger vedr. parkeringsforhold langs Nørre Havnegade mm.

Nørre Havnegade 21-25 (Hotel Alsik) Hvordan kan man afvikle arrangementer med plads til op til 1500 gæster, når man kun råder over 21 parkeringspladser? Samtidig er Venstre og DF imod, at der etableres et motel med 32 værelser på kaserneområdet - blandt andet med begrundelse i de trafikale udfordringer. I øvrigt en sag, som tidligere Venstrepolitiker, Peter Hansen bragte i medierne.

Det ser ud til, at Hansen i praksis stadig er politisk ordfører i Venstre, selv om han har forladt byrådet. Under alle omstændigheder fremførte Venstre og DF villigt Hansens synspunkter i en byrådsdebat, der skabte en smule morskab over Danmarks liberale partis pludselige modvilje mod erhvervsudvikling. Det er naturligvis Peter Hansens ildhu, der har rettet vores opmærksomhed mod de andre projekter på kaserneområdet.

Flere sager på vej De vedlagte akter er kun toppen af isbjerget, men de rummer sager, der giver dig mulighed for ved selvsyn at konstatere, at der er noget helt galt i forvaltningen. Jeg har dokumentation på snesevis af sager, hvor sagsbehandlingen har været lige så mangelfuld eller tilfældig. Jeg håber, at du vil kunne bruge oplysningerne i dit politiske arbejde.

Under alle omstændigheder har jeg gjort dig opmærksom på problematikken. Jeg står naturligvis til rådighed, hvis du har spørgsmål eller brug for uddybende dokumentation. Med venlig hilsen ejeren Klage vedr.

Gerlachsgade 2 og 10, Sønderborg https://site.dybbolbanke.dk/klage-vedr-gerlachsgade-2-og-10-s%C3%B8nderborg_1 Diverse spørgsmål og aktindsigtsanmodninger vedr. parkeringsforhold langs Nørre Havnegade m.m. https://site.dybbolbanke.dk/diverse-sp%C3%B8rgsm%C3%A5l-og-aktindsigtsanmodninger-vedr-parkeringsforhold Daniel Staugaard gør hele sit parti til grin, igen

This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.

Has Venstre been bribed? 
Daniel Staugaard (V) manages to once again make his party the object of ridicule.

Venstre's actions in Sønderborg Kommune raise serious questions that the press dare not ask and that other politicians openly avoid. Is it incompetence, double standards - or is there a more unpleasant explanation behind the illogical decisions?

This week, two cases in the city council have shown how absurd and arbitrary Venstre's priorities can be. Let's dive into them.

Case 1: When expropriation is "impossible"
Venstre refused to support expropriation of land for a public path. The argument? That it was not "socially important enough" – and that the process had not been followed correctly, even though similar procedures have been used countless times in the past.

Daniel Staugaard (V) made a big deal out of defending property rights as inviolable – a stance that at first seems laudable. But as deputy chairman of the committee, he himself bears responsibility for the fact that the process has not been followed correctly. Most startling, however, are Venstre's previous rulings.

Because when it was about beer deliveries to Danfoss's venue, expropriation was suddenly both possible and necessary. Beer for a private company was thus assessed as "socially important", while a public path that could benefit many citizens was not. The grotesque prioritization gives a sharp insight into how conservative politicians apparently choose sides based on who stands to benefit.

Case 2: When expropriation is suddenly "necessary"
In the same meeting, Venstre voted in favor of expropriating land for a traffic intersection at a new resort – a project that clearly benefits local business interests. 
Here, property rights were suddenly no longer considered inviolable. Daniel Staugaard, who a few minutes ago had strong opinions about the property rights in the path case, now became completely silent. No explanations, no defenses – just an awkward silence.

Venstre and friends
It's hard to miss the pattern: when decisions have to be made, Venstre's attitude seems to depend on who is behind the project. Danfoss owner Jørgen Mads Clausen and businessman Peter Hansen, described as a serial-bankruptcy entrepreneur, seem to have a significant influence on the party's actions. No mayoral candidate for 2025
Is Ellen Trane Nørby still the mayoral candidate for Venstre for the election in 2025 or is she tired of losing?

After all, she has only lost once, while her predecessor, Peter Hansen – described as a serial-bankruptcy entrepreneur – had to go through several defeats before retiring. Ellen Trane Nørby could appropriately point to the Danfoss owner Jørgen Mads Clausen, as it often seems to be his word – and not Danish legislation – that decides in Sønderborg.

An email with no reply
We have sent Daniel Staugaard an email with questions about the many illogical decisions and special treatments that characterize the municipality. The answer? It remains a mystery.
If you, dear reader, are wondering how these things can happen in a legal society like Denmark, you are not alone. We encourage you to ask the questions that no one else dares – because Sønderborg deserves better.

From: the owner
Date: Tues. 22. Nov. 2022 at 20.06
Subject: There are irregularities in the municipality you represent. Daniel Staugaard
To: <das@sonderborg.dk>
Dear City Councilor Daniel Staugaard
There are irregularities in the municipality you represent.

Legislation, which should be the same for everyone, is bent to the edge in the administration to favor a selected group of citizens - and inhibit initiative and development in others. In many cases, they go so far that the country's laws are apparently not respected. As an elected representative, I assume that you have an obligation to your constituents to help ensure that all citizens receive the same fair treatment in Sønderborg Kommune.

Therefore, I feel that you should be informed that the reality at the moment is completely different. While the administration puts so many obstacles in the way of some construction projects that they will probably never be possible to complete, other, completely similar cases, run through in record time. Incidentally, with the same case handlers.

From the outside, it appears that a group of the city's business people can largely dictate the administration's decisions in advance. For example, an unbiased examination of 3 building cases such as: Sergenten, Møllestedgård and Skansegården could reveal that the same case manager/conservation architect has assessed incredibly differently in the individual cases. I have precise documentation that shows how differently things are assessed.

In Sønderborg, everyone is not equal before the law, and despite many attempts, it has proved completely impossible to focus on the problems internally in the municipality. An earlier attempt to point out the discrimination in a municipal case manager's assessments produced a strong response from Sønderborg municipality management - but unfortunately only in the form of a denial that there was a problem at all. That is why I am now trying, with a team of specialists, to get bodies outside Sønderborg to assess some of the most blatantly discriminatory cases.

It involves, for example, Vejdirektoratet, Planklagenævnet and others. I am of course aware that the administration cannot act completely out of sync with the political committees - which is why this information is probably not new knowledge to everyone. Since I do not know how many politicians are part of this game - or are aware that it is going on - I am sending this text to you and all other city council members.

I ask you to take a few minutes to look at the attached documentation, which was primarily brought to light through access to documents. The material is also sent to the planning appeal board. Planklagenævnet - Complaint regarding Gerlachsgade 2 and 10, Sønderborg
Exceeding the permitted building areas, insufficient environmental screening/environmental assessment, failure to take into account original architecture and cobblestone paving worthy of preservation, etc.

How do you get permission to establish a concert venue with, among other things, a hospital as a neighbour? Various questions and document access requests regarding parking conditions along Nørre Havnegade mm. Nørre Havnegade 21-25 (Hotel Alsik)
How can you run events with space for up to 1500 guests when you only have 21 parking spaces?

At the same time, Venstre and DF are against the establishment of a motel with 32 rooms in the barracks area - among other reasons, on the grounds of the traffic challenges. Incidentally, a case that former Politician from Venstre, Peter Hansen brought to the media. It seems that in practice Hansen is still political rapporteur in Venstre, even though he has left the city council.

In any case, Venstre and DF willingly advanced Hansen's views in a city council debate, which created some amusement at Denmark's Liberal Party's sudden aversion to commercial development. It is, of course, Peter Hansen's ildhu that has directed our attention to the other projects in the barracks area. More cases on the way
The attached files are only the tip of the iceberg, but they contain cases that give you the opportunity to see for yourself that there is something completely wrong with the administration.

I have documentation of dozens of cases where the case management has been equally flawed or haphazard. I hope that you will be able to use the information in your political work. In any case, I have brought the problem to your attention.

I am of course available if you have questions or need more detailed documentation. Kind regards
the owner

Go to Complaint regarding Gerlachsgade 2 and 10, Sønderborg

Go to Miscellaneous questions and document access requests regarding parking conditions along Nørre Havnegade etc.