Source title in the reading translation: Town house from 1880 – Demolition permit for a town house worthy of preservation
Recorded publication dates:
How to read this material
Automatic reading translation
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Text version dated 13 Dec 2020
Town house from 1880 – Demolition permit for a town house worthy of preservation. Stien 2 was built as a historicist town house in 1880 and has rendered masonry with white masonry details and a cornice. Its façades are well proportioned, with regularly spaced windows and doors featuring brick arches, profiled sills and window openings.
The north- and south-facing façades are also adorned with a front gable to the west, making the building appear 2 storeys high towards Storegade. The town house has a preservation value of 4 on the SAVE scale. The owner explains the demolition application by saying the buildings have not been sufficiently maintained over a prolonged period and are therefore in poor condition.
The owner wants to build new homes on the plot. Quotation from the administration’s decision: ‘Demolition of the property will further weaken the immediate surroundings in Broager town centre because the building has a space-defining effect. Furthermore, one of Broager’s older buildings will be lost.
A new building cannot replace the authenticity and history it possesses, which also enhance the visibility of the town’s development history. In this specific case, however, the administration assesses that the loss of cultural heritage resulting from a possible demolition will be minimal, and therefore recommends adapting a new building.’ This building too is disappearing into oblivion without protests or interest from Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti or the regional media company. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case is that the municipal caseworker advises the applicant on how to get the case approved by Teknik- og Miljøudvalget most easily.
We would like that solution-oriented caseworker to handle the building permit for Skansegården. No… wait. We already have that person ;0) Stien 2, 6310 Broager https://sonderborgkommune.dk/hoeringer/nedrivningsanmeldelse-stien-2-6310-broager
Original source text
Read the Danish original
Source title: Byhus fra 1880 - Nedrivningstilladelse til bevaringsværdigt byhus
Text version dated 13 Dec 2020
Byhus fra 1880 - Nedrivningstilladelse til bevaringsværdigt byhus Stien 2 er opført som et historicistisk byhus i 1880 og fremstår i pudset murværk med hvide murværksdetaljer og gesims. Byhusets facader fremstår velproportionerede og med taktfaste vinduer og døre, der er udført med buestik samt profilerede sålbænke og vinduesåbninger. Bygningens nord- og sydvendte facader er ligeledes prydet med en frontgavl mod vest, der gør, at bygningen syner af en 2 etages bygning mod Storegade.
Byhuset er registreret med en bevaringsværdi på 4 ifølge SAVE-skalaen. Ejer begrunder sin nedrivningsansøgning med, at bygningerne i en længere periode ikke er blevet tilstrækkeligt vedligeholdt og derfor er i dårlig forfatning. Ejer ønsker at opføre nye boliger på matriklen.
Citat fra forvaltningens afgørelse: ”Nedrivning af ejendommen vil svække nærmiljøet i Broager midtby yderligere, da bygningen har en rumdannende virkning. Ydermere vil en af de ældre bygninger i Broager gå tabt, hvor en ny bygning ikke vil kunne erstatte den autenticitet og historie bygningen besidder, hvilket ligeledes styrker synligheden af byens udviklingshistorie. I dette specifikke tilfælde, vurderer forvaltningen dog, at det tab af kulturarv, der finder sted ved en eventuel nedrivning vil være minimalt, og forvaltningen anbefaler derfor tilpasning af en ny bygning.” Denne bygning forsvinder også i glemslen uden protester eller interesse fra Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti og det regionale mediehus.
Det mest interessante i sagen er måske, at den kommunale sagsbehandler i denne sag vejleder ansøgeren i, hvordan han lettest får sagen godkendt i Teknik- og Miljøudvalget. Den løsningsorienterede sagsbehandler vil vi gerne have på byggetilladelsen til Skansegården. Nej… vent.
Det har vi jo allerede ;0) Stien 2, 6310 Broager https://sonderborgkommune.dk/hoeringer/nedrivningsanmeldelse-stien-2-6310-broager
Images and document images
Other text versions
Text version dated Sources without a confirmed post date
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Town house from 1880
– Demolition permit for a townhouse worthy of preservation
Stien 2 was built as a historicist town house in 1880 and has rendered masonry with white masonry details and a cornice. Its façades are well proportioned, with regularly spaced windows and doors featuring brick arches, profiled sills and window openings. The north- and south-facing façades are also adorned with a front gable to the west, making the building appear 2 storeys high towards Storegade. The town house has a preservation value of 4 on the SAVE scale.
The owner justifies the demolition application by stating that the buildings have not been adequately maintained for a prolonged period and are therefore in poor condition. The owner wishes to build new homes on the plot.
Quotation from the administration’s decision:
‘Demolition of the property will further weaken the immediate environment in central Broager, as the building has a space-defining effect. Furthermore, one of the older buildings in Broager will be lost, and a new building will not be able to replace the authenticity and history possessed by the building, which also reinforces the visibility of the town’s development history. In this specific case, however, the administration assesses that the loss of cultural heritage from possible demolition will be minimal, and the administration therefore recommends adapting a new building.’
This building too is disappearing into oblivion without protests or interest from Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti or the regional media company.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the case is that the municipal case officer guides the applicant on how to get the case approved most easily by the Technical and Environment Committee. We would like that solution-oriented case officer to handle Skansegården’s building permit. No… wait. We already have that person ;0)
Read the Danish original
Byhus fra 1880
– Nedrivningstilladelse til bevaringsværdigt byhus
Stien 2 er opført som et historicistisk byhus i 1880 og fremstår i pudset murværk med hvide murværksdetaljer og gesims. Byhusets facader fremstår velproportionerede og med taktfaste vinduer og døre, der er udført med buestik samt profilerede sålbænke og vinduesåbninger. Bygningens nord- og sydvendte facader er ligeledes prydet med en frontgavl mod vest, der gør, at bygningen syner af en 2 etages bygning mod Storegade. Byhuset er registreret med en bevaringsværdi på 4 ifølge SAVE-skalaen.
Ejer begrunder sin nedrivningsansøgning med, at bygningerne i en længere periode ikke er blevet tilstrækkeligt vedligeholdt og derfor er i dårlig forfatning. Ejer ønsker at opføre nye boliger på matriklen.
Citat fra forvaltningens afgørelse:
”Nedrivning af ejendommen vil svække nærmiljøet i Broager midtby yderligere, da bygningen har en rumdannende virkning. Ydermere vil en af de ældre bygninger i Broager gå tabt, hvor en ny bygning ikke vil kunne erstatte den autenticitet og historie bygningen besidder, hvilket ligeledes styrker synligheden af byens udviklingshistorie. I dette specifikke tilfælde, vurderer forvaltningen dog, at det tab af kulturarv, der finder sted ved en eventuel nedrivning vil være minimalt, og forvaltningen anbefaler derfor tilpasning af en ny bygning.”
Denne bygning forsvinder også i glemslen uden protester eller interesse fra Venstre, Dansk Folkeparti og det regionale mediehus.
Det mest interessante i sagen er måske, at den kommunale sagsbehandler i denne sag vejleder ansøgeren i, hvordan han lettest får sagen godkendt i Teknik- og Miljøudvalget. Den løsningsorienterede sagsbehandler vil vi gerne have på byggetilladelsen til Skansegården. Nej… vent. Det har vi jo allerede ;0)