Source title in the reading translation: “That is also why political consideration is proposed, and in this case our political position is that we cannot vote for a

Recorded publication dates:

How to read this material

People named in the source texts

People in the archive (2)

Automatic reading translation

This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.

Text version dated 7 May 2020

‘That is also why political consideration is proposed, and in this case our political position is that we cannot vote for demolition of Skansegården in the location it has – right in the middle of Danish history, says committee member Tage Petersen(V), who agrees with the committee’s deputy chairman, Stefan Lydal(DF):’ Funny that Skansegården’s neighbours have had no trouble getting permission! In Venstre & DF, political positions tend to change depending on who applies. The neighbour within the same area: To one side: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/871127356573505 The neighbour on the other side: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1090125614673677 The neighbour in front: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1130610313958540 and the neighbour behind: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1077655502587355 Have been given permission….

Why will nobody from Venstre & DF answer what the difference is between Skansegården and the more than 100 other demolition cases concerning preservation-worthy SAVE buildings that can be found in Sønderborg Kommune? Venstre’s newspaper has written yet another article about Skansegården with lovely summer pictures https://jv.dk/artikel/venstre-og-df-sender-skanseg%C3%A5rden-i-byr%C3%A5det

Original source text

Read the Danish original

Source title: "Det er også derfor, der bliver lagt op til politisk behandling, og i det her tilfælde er vores politiske holdning, at vi ikke kan stemme for en

Text version dated 7 May 2020

"Det er også derfor, der bliver lagt op til politisk behandling, og i det her tilfælde er vores politiske holdning, at vi ikke kan stemme for en nedrivning af Skansegården med den beliggenhed den har - lige midt i Danmarkshistorien, siger udvalgsmedlem Tage Petersen(V), som er på linje med næstformand i udvalget, Stefan Lydal(DF):" Pudsigt det ingen problem har været for naboerne til Skansegården at få lov! I Venstre & DF har de politiske holdninger det med at ændre sig, alt efter hvem der ansøger. Naboen inden for samme område: Til den ene side: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/871127356573505 Naboen til den anden side: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1090125614673677 Naboen foran: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1130610313958540 og naboen bagved: https://www.facebook.com/DybbolBankeSkansegaarden/posts/1077655502587355 Har fået lov ….

Hvorfor er der ingen fra Venstre & DF der vil svare på hvad forskellen er på Skansegården og de over 100 andre bevaringsværdige SAVE nedrivningssager der kan findes i Sønderborg kommune? Venstre avis har skrevet endnu en artikel om Skansegården med fine sommerbilleder https://jv.dk/artikel/venstre-og-df-sender-skanseg%C3%A5rden-i-byr%C3%A5det

Sources and original references