Archive post: »Dear Peter Hansen, Your comment is remarkable« · 2024-12-13

• Jørgen Mads Clausen — Mentioned in the current archived text
• Peter Hansen — Mentioned in the current archived text

Source title: Kære Peter Hansen, Din kommentar er bemærkelsesværdig

Text version dated 13 Dec 2024

Kære Peter Hansen, Din kommentar er bemærkelsesværdig, men ikke helt uden ironi, når man ser på den historik, du og dine allierede har i lokalområdet. Her er nogle tanker, der måske kan bidrage til en lidt bredere forståelse af konteksten – baseret på fakta og observationer fra både Sønderborg og Aabenraa. "Når udviklere ikke får deres vilje" Det er en fin pointe, du bringer op. Men hvordan reagerer du selv og Venstre, når I ikke får jeres vilje?

Historien viser, at I ofte tyr til metoder, der er langt fra de "symbiotiske" processer, du fremhæver. Et glimrende eksempel er rygeskuret og depotbygningen i Sønderborg, hvor Danfoss/BMC Fonden fik dispensationer, som blev nægtet andre. Eller hvad med sagen om parkeringshuset, der blev solgt til Danfoss for en brøkdel af markedsværdien, uden at borgerne blev informeret?

Hvis det ikke er "rå pengemagt," hvad er det så? Hvalen og Aabenraa Du nævner Hvalen, et projekt vi ikke har direkte relation til, men din kommentar afslører, at du tilsyneladende er en del af den opposition, der aktivt har arbejdet imod projektet. Det rejser nogle spørgsmål: Er det Danfoss-ejer Jørgen Mads Clausen, der ønsker at beskytte sine interesser i konferencefaciliteter, og derfor lægger pres på modstand mod Hvalen?

Alsik i Sønderborg blev jo bygget uden modstand fra Venstre, trods dets kontroversielle placering og design. Hvordan kan det være, at kun modstanderne af Hvalen er blevet hørt, mens tilhængernes stemmer stort set er blevet ignoreret i JydskeVestkystens dækning? Kunne det tænkes, at din rolle som bestyrelsesformand i JydskeVestkysten har haft indflydelse?

At Jebsen, en normalt tavs skibsreder og god ven af Jørgen Mads Clausen, pludselig bryder sin stilhed for at skrive et læserbrev imod Hvalen, er sigende. Hvorfor nævner du ikke denne forbindelse i din kritik? Symbiose og ordentlighed Du skriver om behovet for "symbiose imellem befolkning, forvaltning og politikere." Det lyder godt på papiret, men hvad med din egen historie?

Dokumentation viser, at Sønderborgs forvaltning gentagne gange har tilgodeset Danfoss og deres allierede på måder, der rejser alvorlige spørgsmål om transparens og retfærdighed. For eksempel: Brug af offentlige midler til luksusyachter og fly, som i sidste ende blev delvis finansieret af skatteyderne. Tildeling af opgaver til studiekammerater fra forvaltningen, uden at der bliver rejst spørgsmål om habilitet.

Ignorering af afgørelser fra Planklagenævnet, når Danfoss’ interesser er på spil. Hvis vi taler om "ordentlige metoder," hvordan harmonerer dette med de dokumenterede praksisser i Skansegården-sagen? Dokumentation og halve sandheder Du nævner, at vores opslag er insinuationer og halve sandheder.

Men hvad med dine egne udtalelser? Vores opslag på Facebook-siden Dybbøl Banke Skansegården er fuldt dokumenterede. Hvis de var usande, ville dine magtfulde venner have fået stoppet dem for længst – men tavsheden fra jer taler sit tydelige sprog. "Rå pengemagt" Du har fuldstændig misforstået, hvad "rå pengemagt" betyder.

Det handler ikke om kritik på sociale medier, men om magtmisbrug, hvor skatteydernes midler bliver kanaliseret til private interesser, mens medier og myndigheder ser den anden vej. Hvis ikke dine handlinger, og dem vi ser i Sønderborg og Aabenraa, er eksempler på dette, hvad er så? En sidste tanke Du afslutter med "tryk avler modtryk." Det er en interessant refleksion, især når den kommer fra en person, der har brugt årtier på at udnytte sit netværk og sine forbindelser til at lukke munden på kritikere og styre dagsordenen i Sønderborg.

Men måske er vinden ved at vende. Måske er folk ved at gennemskue, hvordan du og dine allierede opererer. Til sidst: tak fordi du fortsætter med at udstille dig selv og dine venner.

Hvis det vi skriver var usandt, ville konsekvenserne nok have været mærkbare. Men i stedet for at modbevise os, ser vi blot flere afsløringer dukke op. Vi glæder os til at se, hvad fremtiden bringer – og til at fortsætte med at dokumentere virkeligheden.

Venlig hilsen Dybbøl Banke Skansegården PS: Det er interessant, at denne kommentar fremkommer i en lukket Facebook-gruppe, hvor adgang kun gives med godkendelse af Peter Hansen og hans allierede, og hvor kritiske indlæg konsekvent slettes. Det er bemærkelsesværdigt, hvordan Peter Hansen ofte fjerner opslag, der ikke støtter hans agenda. Tag et kig her, hvis opslaget stadig er tilgængeligt og ikke allerede er blevet slettet. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18DhEVL6bi/

This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.

Dear Peter Hansen,
your comment is remarkable

Dear Peter Hansen,
Your comment is remarkable, but not entirely without irony when you look at the history you and your allies have in the local area. Here are some thoughts that may contribute to a slightly broader understanding of the context - based on facts and observations from both Sønderborg and Aabenraa.
"When developers don't get their way"
That's a fine point you bring up. But how do you and Venstre react when you don't get your way?

History shows that you often resort to methods that are far from the "symbiotic" processes you highlight. An excellent example is the smoking shed and storage building in Sønderborg, where Danfoss/BMC Fonden were given exemptions that were denied to others. Or what about the case of the parking garage that was sold to Danfoss for a fraction of the market value without informing the citizens?

If that's not "raw money power," what is?

The whale and Aabenraa
You mention Hvalen, a project we have no direct relationship with, but your comment reveals that you are apparently part of the opposition that has actively worked against the project. This raises some questions:
Is Danfoss owner Jørgen Mads Clausen wanting to protect his interests in conference facilities and therefore pushing for opposition to Hvalen? After all, Alsik in Sønderborg was built without opposition from Venstre, despite its controversial location and design.

How is it that only the opponents of Hvalen have been heard, while the voices of the supporters have been largely ignored in JydskeVestkysten's coverage? Is it conceivable that your role as chairman of the board in JydskeVestkysten has had an influence? That Jebsen, a normally silent shipowner and good friend of Jørgen Mads Clausen, suddenly breaks his silence to write a reader's letter against Hvalen is telling.

Why don't you mention this connection in your criticism?

Symbiosis and orderliness
You write about the need for "symbiosis between population, administration and politicians." 
That sounds good on paper, but what about your own story? Documentation shows that Sønderborg's administration has repeatedly accommodated Danfoss and their allies in ways that raise serious questions about transparency and fairness.

For example:
Use of public funds for luxury yachts and aircraft, which were ultimately partially financed by the taxpayer.
Assignment of tasks to fellow students from the administration, without raising questions about impartiality.
Ignoring decisions of Planklagenævnet when Danfoss's interests are at stake.
If we are talking about "proper methods," how does this square with the documented practices in the Skansegården case?

Documentation and half-truths
You mention that our posts are innuendo and half-truths. But what about your own statements? Our posts on the Facebook page Dybbøl Banke Skansegården are fully documented. 
If they were untrue, your powerful friends would have stopped them long ago - but your silence speaks volumes.

"Raw Money Power"
You have completely misunderstood what "raw money power" means. It is not about criticism on social media, but about abuse of power, where taxpayers' funds are channeled to private interests, while the media and authorities look the other way. If your actions and those we see in Sønderborg and Aabenraa are not examples of this, what is?

One last thought
You end with "pressure breeds counterpressure." It's an interesting reflection, especially coming from someone who has spent decades leveraging his network and connections to silence critics and steer the agenda of Sønderborg. But perhaps the wind is turning. Maybe people are seeing through how you and your allies operate.

Finally: Thank you for continuing to exhibit yourself and your friends. If what we write was untrue, the consequences would probably have been noticeable. But instead of being disproved, we just see more revelations emerge.

We look forward to seeing what the future holds – and to continuing to document reality. Kind regards
Dybbøl Banke Skansegården
P.S.: It is interesting that this comment appears in a closed Facebook group, where access is only granted with the approval of Peter Hansen and his allies, and where critical posts are consistently deleted. It is remarkable how Peter Hansen often removes posts that do not support his agenda.

Take a look here if the post is still available and hasn't already been deleted.

Politics in Sønderborg | WHEN DEVELOPERS NOT FOR THEIR WILL | Facebook WHEN DEVELOPERS NOT FOR THEIR WILL
Each municipality has its contractors and developers. That's good.
People with visions and ideas help create the dynamism a municipality needs. It can...

Don't see anything above? Authorize again