Source title in the reading translation: Appendix 4 – Access to parts of the records refused
Recorded publication dates: ,
How to read this material
People named in the source texts
People in the archive (2)
- Kjeld Stærk — Mentioned in the current archived text
- Peter Hansen — Mentioned in the current archived text
Automatic reading translation
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Text version dated 3 Mar 2023
Does Venstre create unnecessary municipal costs? Appendix 4 – access to parts of the records refused. In this appendix, Sønderborg Kommune says there are vital parts of the case it does not wish to let us inspect.
Why might that be? That is why you must pay! Venstre’s new city council candidate Kjeld Stærk recently pointed out, among other things, in an opinion piece in JydskeVestkysten: “The administrative costs of Sønderborg Kommune are among the country’s highest relative to the size of the municipality.” Could the fact that Venstre’s own city councillors use the administration for private crusades contribute to these costs, such as the years-long fight against Skansegården?
In this documentation, we show that Peter Erik Hansen was able to mobilise Sønderborg kommune’s entire administration and expensive external lawyers simply by saying he was offended that we used one of Sønderborg Kommune’s official press photos on this page. Officials and lawyers worked on the case for more than half a year before the municipality acknowledged there was no case. It is now being considered by Ankestyrelsen, so the meter is still running.
Administrative and legal costs have already reached many hundreds of thousands of DKK, which you as a taxpayer must help finance. Remember to thank Peter Erik Hansen and Venstre. There are hundreds of appendices.
We have handpicked some of the most interesting to share in the coming period. Today, read appendix 4: https://site.dybbolbanke.dk/bilag-4-dele-af-aktindsigt-n%C3%A6gtet (This post has previously appeared on our Facebook page.)
Original source text
Read the Danish original
Source title: Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet
Text version dated 3 Mar 2023
Skaber Venstre unødvendige kommunale omkostninger? Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet I dette bilag fortæller Sønderborg Kommune, at der er vitale dele af sagen, som de ikke ønsker at give os aktindsigt i. Hvorfor mon?
Derfor skal du betale! Venstres nye byrådskandidat, Kjeld Stærk påpegede for nylig, i et debatindlæg i JydskeVestkysten, blandt andet at: ”Administrationsomkostningerne i Sønderborg Kommune hører til blandt landets højeste i forhold til kommunens størrelse.” Kan det være en medvirkende årsag til omkostningerne, at Venstres egne byrådsmedlemmer bruger administrationen til private korstog? Eksempelvis den årelange kamp mod Skansegården?
I dokumentationen her viser vi, at Peter Erik Hansen var i stand til at aktivere hele Sønderborg kommunes administration og dyre eksterne jurister blot på en henvendelse om, at han var fornærmet over, at vi her på siden havde brugt et af Sønderborg Kommunes officielle pressefotos. Sagen beskæftigede embedsmænd og jurister i mere end et halvt år, før Kommunen erkendte, at der ikke var nogen sag. Lige nu behandles den af ankestyrelsen, så taxameteret tæller stadig.
Administrationsomkostningerne og advokatomkostningerne er allerede løbet op i mange hundrede tusinde kroner - som du, som skatteborger, skal medfinansiere. Husk at takke Peter Erik Hansen og Venstre for det. Der er hundredvis af bilag.
Vi har håndplukket nogle af de mest interessante, som vi deler med dig den kommende tid. Læs i dag - bilag 4 https://site.dybbolbanke.dk/bilag-4-dele-af-aktindsigt-n%C3%A6gtet (Opslaget har tidligere været bragt på vores Facebook side)
Images and document images
Documents for this article
Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet_.pdf
Read the document →Other text versions
Text version dated Sources without a confirmed post date
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Appendix 4 – Access to parts of the records refused
In this appendix, Sønderborg Kommune says there are vital parts of the case to which it does not wish to give us access. Why might that be?
That is why you must pay! Venstre's new municipal council candidate, Kjeld Stærk, recently pointed out, among other things, in an opinion piece in JydskeVestkysten that:
‘Sønderborg Kommune’s administrative costs are among the country’s highest relative to the municipality’s size.’
Could the fact that Venstre’s own city councillors use the administration for private crusades be a contributing factor in the costs? For example, the years-long fight against Skansegården?
In the documentation here, we show that Peter Erik Hansen was able to mobilise the entire administration of Sønderborg kommune and expensive external lawyers simply by saying he was offended that we had used one of Sønderborg Kommune’s official press photos on this page. The case occupied civil servants and lawyers for more than half a year before the municipality acknowledged that there was no case. It is currently being considered by Ankestyrelsen, so the meter is still running.
Administrative and legal costs have already run into many hundreds of thousands of kroner - which you, as a taxpayer, have to help finance. Remember to thank Peter Erik Hansen and Venstre for that. There are hundreds of supporting documents.
We have hand-picked some of the most interesting, which we will share with you in the coming period.
Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet_.pdf
Read the Danish original
Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet
I dette bilag fortæller Sønderborg Kommune, at der er vitale dele af sagen, som de ikke ønsker at give os aktindsigt i. Hvorfor mon?
Derfor skal du betale! Venstres nye byrådskandidat, Kjeld Stærk påpegede for nylig, i et debatindlæg i JydskeVestkysten, blandt andet at:
”Administrationsomkostningerne i Sønderborg Kommune hører til blandt landets højeste i forhold til kommunens størrelse.”
Kan det være en medvirkende årsag til omkostningerne, at Venstres egne byrådsmedlemmer bruger administrationen til private korstog? Eksempelvis den årelange kamp mod Skansegården?
I dokumentationen her viser vi, at Peter Erik Hansen var i stand til at aktivere hele Sønderborg kommunes administration og dyre eksterne jurister blot på en henvendelse om, at han var fornærmet over, at vi her på siden havde brugt et af Sønderborg Kommunes officielle pressefotos. Sagen beskæftigede embedsmænd og jurister i mere end et halvt år, før Kommunen erkendte, at der ikke var nogen sag. Lige nu behandles den af ankestyrelsen, så taxameteret tæller stadig.
Administrationsomkostningerne og advokatomkostningerne er allerede løbet op i mange hundrede tusinde kroner - som du, som skatteborger, skal medfinansiere. Husk at takke Peter Erik Hansen og Venstre for det. Der er hundredvis af bilag.
Vi har håndplukket nogle af de mest interessante, som vi deler med dig den kommende tid.
Bilag 4 - Dele af aktindsigt nægtet_.pdf


