Source title in the reading translation: Fredningsnævnet’s decision also emphasises the assessment from Museum Sønderjylland. Thus, the unit head in Museum Sønderjylland’s histor…

Recorded publication dates:

How to read this material

People named in the source texts

People in the archive (1)

Automatic reading translation

This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.

Fredningsnævnet’s decision also places weight on Museum Sønderjylland’s assessment. Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen, head of the unit in Museum Sønderjylland’s historical department, previously told JydskeVestkysten: ‘We are not objecting to the demolition of Skansegården. In general, it is sad when part of the cultural heritage disappears, but Skansegården is in poor condition.

It was built after 1864. It is not a built heritage monument of high value. The only thing in its favour is that it forms part of the cultural-historical landscape.’ Read more:

Original source text

Read the Danish original

Source title: Fredningsnævnets afgørelse lægger desuden vægt på vurderingen fra Museum Sønderjylland. Således har enhedsleder i Museum Sønderjyllands historisk

Fredningsnævnets afgørelse lægger desuden vægt på vurderingen fra Museum Sønderjylland. Således har enhedsleder i Museum Sønderjyllands historiske afdeling Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen tidligere udtalt følgende til JydskeVestkysten: "Vi nedlægger ikke protest mod nedrivning af Skansegården. Generelt er det trist, når der ryger en del af kulturarven, men Skansegården er i dårlig stand.

Den er bygget efter 1864. Det er ikke et bygningsminde af høj værdi. Det eneste, der bærer den, er den er en del af det kulturhistoriske landskab." Læs mere:

Sources and original references