Source title in the reading translation: Aase Nyegaard (Fælleslisten), chair of the technical and environmental committee, says it is good to have a decision. “I think it is good to have a decision…
Recorded publication dates:
How to read this material
People named in the source texts
People in the archive (2)
- Aase Nyegaard — Mentioned in the current archived text
- Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen — Mentioned in the current archived text
Automatic reading translation
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Text version dated 22 Mar 2020
Aase Nyegaard (Fælleslisten), chair of the technical and environmental committee, says it is good to have a decision. “I think it is good to have a decision from a body that knows something about this. Then we must look at the specific proposal for a new building when it comes.
Because I expect an application for demolition will also come,” says Aase Nyegaard. Fredningsnævnet’s decision also emphasises the assessment from Museum Sønderjylland. Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen, unit head in Museum Sønderjylland’s historical department, previously told JydskeVestkysten: “We are not protesting against the demolition of Skansegården.
It is generally sad when part of our cultural heritage goes, but Skansegården is in poor condition. It was built after 1864. It is not an architectural monument of high value.
The only thing supporting its significance is that it is part of the cultural-historical landscape.” Read more:
Original source text
Read the Danish original
Source title: Formanden for teknik- og miljøudvalget, Aase Nyegaard (Fælleslisten), kalder det rart med en afgørelse. - Jeg synes, det er rart med en afgørelse
Text version dated 22 Mar 2020
Formanden for teknik- og miljøudvalget, Aase Nyegaard (Fælleslisten), kalder det rart med en afgørelse. - Jeg synes, det er rart med en afgørelse fra en instans, som ved noget om det her. Så må vi se på det konkrete forslag for at bygge nyt, når det kommer. For jeg regner med, at der også kommer en ansøgning om nedrivning, siger Aase Nyegaard.
Fredningsnævnets afgørelse lægger desuden vægt på vurderingen fra Museum Sønderjylland. Således har enhedsleder i Museum Sønderjyllands historiske afdeling Carsten Porskrog Rasmussen tidligere udtalt følgende til JydskeVestkysten: "Vi nedlægger ikke protest mod nedrivning af Skansegården. Generelt er det trist, når der ryger en del af kulturarven, men Skansegården er i dårlig stand.
Den er bygget efter 1864. Det er ikke et bygningsminde af høj værdi. Det eneste, der bærer den, er den er en del af det kulturhistoriske landskab." Læs mere: