Source title in the reading translation: “If the committee had said no, that could have meant considerable expenditure. Experience from a case in Bjerggade in Aabenraa shows this, where the municipality eventually…
Recorded publication dates: ,
How to read this material
People named in the source texts
People in the archive (1)
- Philip Tietje — Mentioned in the current archived text
Automatic reading translation
This is an automatic reading translation. The source’s allegations and assessments have not been independently confirmed through translation. Check wording, qualifications and meaning against the preserved Danish original. Some retained numbers may use Danish separators: a dot for thousands and a comma for decimals. Check amounts against the Danish original.
Text version dated 24 May 2020
“If the committee had said no, that could have meant considerable expenditure. Experience from a case in Bjerggade in Aabenraa shows this, where the municipality was eventually forced to buy a large villa worthy of preservation because the owner had been refused permission to demolish it.” Philip Tietje (V). Read more here:
Original source text
Read the Danish original
Source title: "Hvis udvalget havde sagt nej, kunne det have betydet store udgifter. Det viser erfaringen fra en sag fra Bjerggade i Aabenraa, hvor kommunen til
Text version dated 24 May 2020
"Hvis udvalget havde sagt nej, kunne det have betydet store udgifter. Det viser erfaringen fra en sag fra Bjerggade i Aabenraa, hvor kommunen til sidst blev tvunget til at købe en stor, bevaringsværdig villa, fordi ejeren havde fået nej til nedrivning." Philip Tietje (V) Læs mere her: